People Strategy case study

Is Your HR Ready for the Company You Are Becoming?

3×growth planned in 5 years
15interviews: 5 HR leaders, 10 business leaders
13HR capabilities scored
4maturity levels, from basic to leading

The situation

The question behind the question.

An IT consulting firm of about 1,500 people had set itself a goal: 3 times bigger in 5 years. To get operations ready, its CEO brought in a partner consultancy, with HR as one of 4 workstreams, and we led that one. The HR function had a new leadership team and a clear sense of its strategic role. What nobody could yet say was whether it could carry that growth: recruit, develop and keep 3 times the people, with the processes and systems it had.

As it was asked

“Can our HR function keep up with our growth?”

As we reframed it

Measure HR against the company it must become: where each capability stands, where scale requires it to be, what closing the gap takes and how long it will take.

How we worked

How the work unfolded.

01

Hear the leaders

We started with 15 interviews: 5 with the HR leadership team and 10 with the business, from the CEO to the heads of business units. The same guide covered organisation, people, process and technology, so what HR said about itself could be laid against what its internal clients needed from it. Around the interviews, we read the firm’s growth plan, its HR strategy, its employer offer, its turnover data and its competitive positioning.

02

Score every capability

Then the scan. 13 HR capabilities, grouped in 5 layers from HR strategy to the operating model, were each scored on a 4-level maturity scale, from basic to leading, and set against published distributions of how other organisations score. HR staffing was benchmarked too, as HR people per 100 employees, today and at 3 times the size. The pattern was clear: HR lagged on 4 of the 5 layers, and its talent processes did not yet connect to each other.

03

Sequence the climb

Each capability then got 2 positions: where it stands, and where a firm 3 times bigger needs it by 2025, for most one level up. That target drew on how large consulting firms run HR at scale, from more than 15 years inside the Big 4. The maturity models made the gap visible and turned the discussion to what closing it takes and how long, since one level usually takes 1 to 3 years. Priorities followed existing pain points, business impact and the growth plan. The roadmap set 13 short-term actions for the first 6 months, a 36-month path, and workforce planning staged from headcount, to skills, to scenarios.

04

Agree it with HR

The findings went to the CEO in 2 reviews, then to the whole HR team in a 2-day workshop, where live polls tested whether the priorities resonated before they were adopted. 5 work packages came out for the following year: a people strategy, a skills-based classification of talent, and frameworks for performance, careers and leadership. An HR scorecard of about 36 indicators gave the function its first common way to track progress.

The instrument

Where you are, where you need to be, how long it takes

Where you are. Each capability scored on 4 levels: basic, developing, advanced, leading, against how other organisations score.

Where you need to be. The level the growth plan requires by 2025. For most capabilities, one step up; for a few, not yet a priority.

How long it takes. One level usually takes 1 to 3 years, so the roadmap runs on 2 horizons: 6 months for the first moves, 36 months for the climb, staged as walk, jog and run.

The gap turns a judgement into a sequence: what to fix first, and what can wait.

What moved

What changed, and what didn't.

13short-term actions, one per capability, for the first 6 months
Evidence Decision taken Adopted in practice Measured impact
What moved

The CEO reviewed the findings twice, and the HR team validated the priorities in the room. The roadmap gave HR 13 short-term actions, a 36-month path and a scorecard to track it. The firm then brought us back for the next step: its skills-based talent framework.

What didn't move

The roadmap said what and when, not what it would cost. The brief asked for initiatives and their sequence, not for resourcing or a business case, so the investment behind each step was left unsized. Succession was judged not yet relevant for the first year and left for later.

What we'd say to a peer

Growth plans are written for revenue and headcount, rarely for the HR function that has to deliver the headcount. Before scaling, score each HR capability against the company you are becoming, not the one you are. Then ask the 2 questions that turn a gap into a plan: what does closing it take, and how long?

Method note:

Own approach in 4 steps; 15 interviews; 13-capability maturity scan on a 4-level scale; HR staffing benchmark; 2-horizon roadmap.

WeAreHuman@Work

One piece of evidence on sustainable work, every Sunday. Free, and one click to leave.

Get the weekly edition